Skip to main content

Did Jesus create birds?

Did Jesus create birds?

Not according to this verse:

Surely those on whom you call upon instead of Allah cannot create even a fly, though they should all combine together for the purpose. And if the fly should snatch away anything from them, they cannot recover it therefrom. Weak, indeed, are both the seeker and the sought. (22:74)

It says that it is not in the power of false gods to create a creature as insignificant as a fly. If the ability to create a fly confers godhead, creation of a bird would undoubtedly do the same, even more so, since a bird is a higher order creature than a fly. Some Muslims, misunderstanding the metaphorical expression used in 3:50, believe that Jesus as created birds. This verse strikes at the heart of that notion and completely discounts the possibility. Among all those who are “called upon instead of Allah”, Jesus occupies a position of distinction. He has without doubt the highest number of followers. If it is accepted that he could create, with or without God's permission, living birds of flesh and blood, then the argument of 22:74 is defeated in its first and most important test case.

In defense of literal interpretation of 3:50, it is argued that Jesus could create birds and could also bring dead people back to life only with the permission of Allah. And since to permit remains Allah's prerogative, hence there is no problem and Unity of Godhead remains intact. This line of reasoning, unfortunately, weakens the argument in the verse above. On the one hand we are told that only Allah creates life. It distinguishes Him from His creation and is a power He is loathe to share with anyone else. But on the other, we are told of certain people, admittedly pious, who have been granted this ability. Whether such people were pious or wicked, prophet or non-prophet, it makes no difference. If true, such delegation of ability to create life by God to any of His creation would entirely compromise the Unity of Godhead. What conclusion is a neutral observer to draw from this? There can be only one: that there are more than one entities which create life. By delegating His ability to create life, God would stand accused of thoroughly confusing the issue and making the matter of finding the One True God impossibly difficult for the seeker of truth. How is to be ascertained which of the ancients created life with Allah's leave and which created without it? In this circumstance there would be no justification in condemning those who associate partners with Allah.

Then again, whatever happened to the birds created by Jesus? Such birds must have reproduced and spread. Which would lead us to believe there are two types of birds in the world: ones created by Allah and others created by Jesus. More likely these two types have intermixed such that it is impossible to say with certainty if a particular bird is wholly created by Allah, by Jesus or by both together.

If this is not shirk, what is?

Meaning of Birds in the Quran

There is no contradiction in the Holy Quran. The term 'birds' is a metaphor for people who attain great spiritual heights. See the following:

Seest thou not that it is Allah Whose praises, all who are in the heavens and the earth celebrate, and so do the birds with their wings outspread? (24:42)

Regular birds along with the rest of God's creation, animate and inanimate are accounted for in all who are in the heavens and the earth. The birds with their wings outspread has to be the most noble of all creation that praise Allah, which can be none other than the spiritual man, worthy of a special and honored mention.

Source Jazakallah to A Omer Sahib


Popular posts from this blog

If Jesus did not die upon the cross: A study in evidence

The Last Supper This is a small booklet with a very descriptive title, written by an Australian Judge, Ernest Brougham Docker, in 1920. He became a judge of the District Court and chairman of Quarter Sessions for the north-western district in 1881. He retired in 1918 after the passage of the Judges Retirement Act.
He examines the limitations in the so called testimony of the apostles about resurrection in his book. He makes several strong points against resurrection of Jesus, may peace be on him, but one that can be described in a few lines is quoted here:
“He (Jesus) expressed his forebodings to His disciples, I firmly believe; I am equally convinced that He did not predict His rising again. The Conduct of the disciples after crucifixion shows that they had no expectation of a resurrection; and it is altogether incredible that they could have forgotten a prediction so remarkable.”
There are 14 parts of this short booklet by Ernest Brougham Docker, published in 1920. The fifth part concl…

Aloe and Myrrh: modern day analysis of two ancient herbs

By Arif Khan .. Edited by Jonathan Ghaffar
Aloe and Myrrh are mentioned in the Gospel as being present immediately after the body of Hadhrat Isa (Jesus) was tended to by Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea; the presence of these medicinal plants has often been explained by Christian scholars as being part of an embalming process, whereas Hadhrat Masih Ma’ud (Mirza Ghulam Ahmad) in his treatise “Masih Hindustan Mein” (“Jesus in India”) described how they were essential ingredients for an ointment applied to Jesus’ wounds. What role do these herbs play today? Can an exploration of their modern day uses throw light on possible events 2000 years ago?The mention of the herbs appears in the Crucifixion story as it is recorded in the Gospel of John:

وفات مسیح پر حضرت ابن عباس ؓ کا عقیدہ

سیدناحضرت ابن عباس رضی اللہ تعالیٰ عنہ سورۃآل عمران کی  آیت نمبر ۵۶

کا ترجمہ کرتے ہوئے فرماتے ہیں ۔ مُمِیْتُکَ ۔یعنی مُتَوَفِّیْکَ کا مطلب ہے میں تجھے موت دینے والا ہوں ۔